PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  ANCIENT ANOMALIES  »  Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech  »  Sumerian "Anunnaki" -- what the tablets actually say vs what Sitchin sold
✎ Post Reply   « Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech
Sumerian "Anunnaki" -- what the tablets actually say vs what Sitchin sold
Page 11 of 31   «129101112133031»
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 83286748
From: a VPN, probably
#81▸ Posted: 01 Dec 1999, 16:04 GMT
Pressure finding form is good, but why base-60 specifically?
mod_Kenji
Moderator · Asia Desk
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 14,002
Joined: Sep 1999
From: Yokohama, JP
#82▸ Posted: 05 Dec 1999, 09:18 JST
Base-60 is useful because 60 divides beautifully: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30. It makes fractions and accounting less ugly. It survives in our minutes and degrees because good administrative tools can outlive empires. That is real lost tech if you want a phrase, but it is not machinery from a visitor. It is a durable convention.
moderator when needed, geologist by training
StelliumSue
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 4,120
Joined: Mar 2000
From: Asheville NC, US
#83▸ Posted: 05 Dec 1999, 10:06 EST
And because sky cycles reward divisibility. You can be wrong about astrology and still see why a sky-clock civilisation would love 60. Please enjoy me being restrained.
the sky was the first clock
Occams_Razorback
Resident Skeptic
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US
#84▸ Posted: 05 Dec 1999, 09:20 CST
I am enjoying the restraint with caution.
I believe exactly one thread on this board. Guess which. -- the 5%
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 30097429
From: a VPN, probably
#85▸ Posted: 17 Dec 1999, 04:18 GMT
What about all the sudden inventions: wheel, writing, law, astronomy. That bundle is too much at once.
Anunna_Adrian
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 4,890
Joined: Jun 1999
From: Leeds, UK
#86▸ Posted: 17 Dec 1999, 18:10 GMT
It is a bundle when seen from far away. Up close, the dates, precursors and functions differ. Tokens precede writing; wheeled vehicles have contexts; law codes grow out of custom and royal display; astronomy grows from calendars and omen practice. The summary "all at once" is a telescope. Useful, but it compresses distance.
Leeds · the tablets say less than the documentaries claim
ArchaeoAstrid
Member
◆◆
Posts: 244
Joined: Jun 2000
From: Aarhus, DK
#87▸ Posted: 21 Dec 1999, 11:34 CET
And "no evidence before" often means perishable evidence, not no practice before. We have a preservation bias toward clay, stone and burnt accidents. The archive is not the past. It is what survived the past badly.
context first
Gilgamesh99
New Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Jan 2002
From: Glasgow, UK
#88▸ Posted: 29 Dec 1999, 19:03 GMT
This may be a stupid comparison, but is it like seeing a printed book and assuming language started with printing because that is where the copies survive?
trying to learn before arguing
Page 11 of 31   «129101112133031»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone