PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  ANCIENT ANOMALIES  »  Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech  »  Sumerian "Anunnaki" -- what the tablets actually say vs what Sitchin sold
✎ Post Reply   « Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech
Sumerian "Anunnaki" -- what the tablets actually say vs what Sitchin sold
Page 26 of 31   «1224252627283031»
DrMarlow
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 612
Joined: Sep 2001
From: Durham, UK
#201▸ Posted: 29 Dec 2001, 09:20 GMT
Creation from clay is not primitive biology. It is metaphysics with dirt under its nails. The human is shaped matter plus borrowed divinity. That is a devastating anthropology and needs no laboratory to be precise.
the source, then the speculation
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 44298380
From: a VPN, probably
#202▸ Posted: 18 Jan 2002, 17:34 EST
A lab is still possible though.
Occams_Razorback
Resident Skeptic
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US
#203▸ Posted: 18 Jan 2002, 17:00 CST
A lab is possible in the sense that a submarine is possible under my lawn. The question is whether the evidence improves when you add it. Here, it mostly gets worse.
I believe exactly one thread on this board. Guess which. -- the 5%
Gilgamesh99
New Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Jan 2002
From: Glasgow, UK
#204▸ Posted: 08 Feb 2002, 20:05 GMT
I reread my first post in this thread and want to apologise to the King List for using it as a trampoline.
trying to learn before arguing
Anunna_Adrian
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 4,890
Joined: Jun 1999
From: Leeds, UK
#205▸ Posted: 08 Feb 2002, 20:44 GMT
Accepted on behalf of impossible kings everywhere.
Leeds · the tablets say less than the documentaries claim
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 63729330
From: a VPN, probably
#206▸ Posted: 04 Mar 2002, 23:22 GMT
Is there a Sumerian equivalent of "ancient people said ancient people were smarter"? Like nostalgia for earlier sages?
DrMarlow
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 612
Joined: Sep 2001
From: Durham, UK
#207▸ Posted: 08 Mar 2002, 09:10 GMT
Yes, in broad form. Many cultures imagine wisdom as older, purer, closer to the gods, then diminished. That pattern can preserve genuine institutional memory, but it can also be a way of authorising present practice by placing its source in unreachable time.
the source, then the speculation
Baldwin_Bea
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 4,980
Joined: Jul 1999
From: Norwich, UK
#208▸ Posted: 16 Mar 2002, 10:02 GMT
Unreachable time is socially useful. If a rule comes from your grandfather, you can argue with it. If it comes from before the flood, argument becomes impiety. That does not make it false. It explains part of its power.
long machinery, small claims
Page 26 of 31   «1224252627283031»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone