PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  ANCIENT ANOMALIES  »  Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech  »  Sumerian "Anunnaki" -- what the tablets actually say vs what Sitchin sold
✎ Post Reply   « Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech
Sumerian "Anunnaki" -- what the tablets actually say vs what Sitchin sold
Page 3 of 31   «123453031»
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 99953843
From: a VPN, probably
#17▸ Posted: 26 Feb 1999, 19:22 GMT
So what is the best English book for someone who wants the real version without learning cuneiform?
Anunna_Adrian
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 4,890
Joined: Jun 1999
From: Leeds, UK
#18▸ Posted: 26 Feb 1999, 20:05 GMT
Start with Stephanie Dalley for myths in translation, Kramer with caution because he is older but still useful, and anything with notes that tell you where the broken places are. A translation that admits uncertainty is usually more trustworthy than one that never blushes.
Leeds · the tablets say less than the documentaries claim
Gilgamesh99
New Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Jan 2002
From: Glasgow, UK
#19▸ Posted: 02 Mar 1999, 18:12 GMT
Ordered Dalley from the library. This board is going to make me poorer and less certain.
trying to learn before arguing
Occams_Razorback
Resident Skeptic
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US
#20▸ Posted: 02 Mar 1999, 12:31 CST
Less certain is cheaper than wrong certainty, even with postage.
I believe exactly one thread on this board. Guess which. -- the 5%
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 75561560
From: a VPN, probably
#21▸ Posted: 10 Mar 1999, 09:08 PST
Nibiru has a 3,600 year orbit. That matches the sar or shar, does it not?
Anunna_Adrian
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 4,890
Joined: Jun 1999
From: Leeds, UK
#22▸ Posted: 10 Mar 1999, 18:33 GMT
It matches a number after Sitchin decides it should. A sar can be 3,600 in the sexagesimal system, but that does not make every use of the number an orbital period. If a culture has a unit equal to 3,600, you still have to prove the text is counting years, then prove it is counting an orbit, then identify the body. Sitchin treats the first step as the whole staircase.
Leeds · the tablets say less than the documentaries claim
gematria_Gita
Member
◆◆
Posts: 640
Joined: Oct 2000
From: New York, US
#23▸ Posted: 15 Mar 1999, 13:02 EST
Base-60 is a machine for making large clean numbers. That is exactly why later number-mystics love it. The danger is mistaking a flexible measuring system for a message addressed to us.
count the misses too
mod_Kenji
Moderator · Asia Desk
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 14,002
Joined: Sep 1999
From: Yokohama, JP
#24▸ Posted: 19 Mar 1999, 08:34 JST
Material note: "abrupt sophistication" is partly an archive problem. Wet mud preserves tablets; wood, fibre, baskets, spoken law and practice do not preserve the same way. Southern Iraq did not become clever only when it became legible to us.
moderator when needed, geologist by training
Page 3 of 31   «123453031»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone