PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  DEEP POLITICS & BLACK PROJECTS  »  Weather Mod, Aerosols & Control Systems  »  Persistent contrails over a county corridor -- pattern not matching civil routes?
✎ Post Reply   « Weather Mod, Aerosols & Control Systems
Persistent contrails over a county corridor -- pattern not matching civil routes?
Page 5 of 5   «12345
Tom_Calloway
Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Feb 2002
From: Bristol, UK
#33▸ Posted: 14 Aug 2001, 22:18 GMT
I will keep it clean. Template I am using: time in GMT, location, compass bearing, number of aircraft, trail start and stop, fade time, spread time, cloud cover before pass, cloud cover after pass, photo frame numbers if any.
logging, not yelling
SaganDad
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 7,330
Joined: Nov 1999
From: the recliner, US
#34▸ Posted: 10 Sep 2001, 22:51 GMT
Amazing how a normal winter sky becomes a case file once everyone gets a clipboard.

Still, the control idea is the first sensible thing in here. If you can show the same route making two different trail types under the same conditions, I will pay attention.
goodnight
LAMINAR_GHOST
Member
◆◆
Posts: 740
Joined: Jan 2002
From: the Midlands, UK
#35▸ Posted: 07 Oct 2001, 23:18 GMT
Freezing today's ledger before sleep. Open questions: were the aircraft on known corridors, did the upper-air humidity support long persistence, did the two-level wind explain the spread, and do the photos match the written bearings?

No chemistry claims entered. Geometry and timing only.
the sky is a ledger -- keep accounts
MUFON_Gail
Field Researcher
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 8,044
Joined: Aug 1999
From: Ohio, US
#36▸ Posted: 03 Nov 2001, 00:02 GMT
Receipt placeholders for the records request are in my notebook now. I will post response dates and file numbers when they arrive, not names of clerks and not guesses about intent.

The request asks for routes, NOTAMs, training notices, and weather-modification records for the logged window.
file the boring forms
Cal_Ullman
Member
◆◆
Posts: 390
Joined: Feb 2001
From: Lincolnshire, UK
#37▸ Posted: 30 Nov 2001, 07:20 GMT
Morning control sky: clear before sunrise, one ordinary westbound trail at 0704 GMT, fade under three minutes, no spread into sheet by 0720.

Surface wind calm, high cloud absent. This is the kind of dull comparison we need beside yesterday.
clouds first, conclusions second
Mags_92
Member
◆◆
Posts: 610
Joined: Sep 2000
From: Northumberland, UK
#38▸ Posted: 26 Dec 2001, 08:14 GMT
Radio control from my side: no matching VHF oddity during yesterday afternoon's main spread, and nothing unusual during this morning's quick-fade trail.

Keeping the negative entries because otherwise the log starts flattering itself.
KJ7MAG -- log it or lose it
QuietHand
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 6,402
Joined: Mar 1999
From: undisclosed, US
#39▸ Posted: 22 Jan 2002, 09:01 GMT
Preserve the negative results with the positive ones. Empty skies, ordinary trails, dead receivers, cloudy days, bad photos, and wrong first impressions all belong in the folder.

A file with only strange entries is a story collection, not a log.
measure the load
LAMINAR_GHOST
Member
◆◆
Posts: 740
Joined: Jan 2002
From: the Midlands, UK
#40▸ Posted: 18 Feb 2002, 09:40 GMT
Marking this thread unresolved, ledger continuing. Yesterday gives us photographs, bearings, timing, witness comparisons, and a records request. It does not give a chemical conclusion or a programme name.

Next useful post should add a comparable day, not a bigger claim.
the sky is a ledger -- keep accounts
Page 5 of 5   «12345
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone