 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 7,330 Joined: Nov 1999 From: the recliner, US |
#25▸ Posted: 12 Jan 2001, 16:12 GMT
Or it was planes making clouds, which happens every day above people who own cameras.
Still, the frame numbering and clock sorting is better than the usual soup, so carry on.
goodnight |
 Member ◆ Posts: 155 Joined: Feb 2002 From: Bristol, UK |
#26▸ Posted: 08 Feb 2001, 18:55 GMT
Log entry. 17 Feb, 1715 local, grocery south lot. One long trail already spread into a veil, one fresh line formed north to south above it.
Sunset colour was orange on the older veil, white on the fresh line. I have receipt time 1719 and two prints from a disposable camera. No throat claims in this entry. I am learning.
still coughing, still writing it down |
 Member ◆◆ Posts: 740 Joined: Jan 2002 From: the Midlands, UK |
#27▸ Posted: 07 Mar 2001, 19:12 GMT
Log day summary: three persistent bands noted from west to east between 13:20 and 16:05, with the longest spread beginning after the second pass.
Surface wind stayed light, but upper drift carried the sheet southeast. No confirmed ground reports yet, so keep this thread to times, bearings, duration, and any control comparisons.
the sky is a ledger -- keep accounts |
 Field Researcher ◆◆◆◆ Posts: 8,044 Joined: Aug 1999 From: Ohio, US |
#28▸ Posted: 02 Apr 2001, 19:38 GMT
FOIA request filed this evening for flight activity, military exercise notices, and any weather-modification records covering the window listed above.
I included the airport codes and the observer times from the log. I will post only the receipt number and response dates when they arrive.
file the boring forms |
 Veteran Member ◆◆◆◆◆ Posts: 10,110 Joined: Dec 1998 From: Arizona, US |
#29▸ Posted: 29 Apr 2001, 20:04 GMT
For controls, please log clear-sky overflights too. Same observer, same location, same time block if possible.
A normal contrail that fades in under two minutes is useful here because it gives us a comparison against the spreading bands.
K7 · logs not throats |
 Senior Member ◆◆◆◆ Posts: 5,210 Joined: Apr 1999 From: Trøndelag, NO |
#30▸ Posted: 26 May 2001, 20:31 GMT
Agree on controls. In Hessdalen work we learned that one strange frame means little without quiet frames around it.
Please add camera direction, estimated elevation, and whether the trail crosses the sunward side or the opposite sky. That will help separate optics from plume behaviour.
Project Hessdalen · mark the clock |
 Member ◆◆ Posts: 610 Joined: Sep 2000 From: Northumberland, UK |
#31▸ Posted: 22 Jun 2001, 21:07 GMT
Radio note: I checked my local VHF log against the 13:20 to 16:05 window. No matching interference, no repeatable squelch breaks, and no beacon dropouts.
That does not clear the sky event, but it means my station shows no radio correlation for today.
KJ7MAG -- log it or lose it |
 Member ◆◆ Posts: 390 Joined: Feb 2001 From: Lincolnshire, UK |
#32▸ Posted: 19 Jul 2001, 21:44 GMT
Weather note for the log: afternoon cirrus was already present before the reported passes, thin and fibrous, with gradual thickening after 15:00.
Humidity aloft may have favoured persistence. I would not call that a conclusion, just a condition to record beside the sightings.
clouds first, conclusions second |