PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  DEEP POLITICS & BLACK PROJECTS  »  Weather Mod, Aerosols & Control Systems  »  Persistent contrails over a county corridor -- pattern not matching civil routes?
✎ Post Reply   « Weather Mod, Aerosols & Control Systems
Persistent contrails over a county corridor -- pattern not matching civil routes?
Page 4 of 5   «12345»
SaganDad
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 7,330
Joined: Nov 1999
From: the recliner, US
#25▸ Posted: 12 Jan 2001, 16:12 GMT
Or it was planes making clouds, which happens every day above people who own cameras.

Still, the frame numbering and clock sorting is better than the usual soup, so carry on.
goodnight
Tom_Calloway
Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Feb 2002
From: Bristol, UK
#26▸ Posted: 08 Feb 2001, 18:55 GMT
Log entry. 17 Feb, 1715 local, grocery south lot. One long trail already spread into a veil, one fresh line formed north to south above it.

Sunset colour was orange on the older veil, white on the fresh line. I have receipt time 1719 and two prints from a disposable camera. No throat claims in this entry. I am learning.
still coughing, still writing it down
LAMINAR_GHOST
Member
◆◆
Posts: 740
Joined: Jan 2002
From: the Midlands, UK
#27▸ Posted: 07 Mar 2001, 19:12 GMT
Log day summary: three persistent bands noted from west to east between 13:20 and 16:05, with the longest spread beginning after the second pass.

Surface wind stayed light, but upper drift carried the sheet southeast. No confirmed ground reports yet, so keep this thread to times, bearings, duration, and any control comparisons.
the sky is a ledger -- keep accounts
MUFON_Gail
Field Researcher
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 8,044
Joined: Aug 1999
From: Ohio, US
#28▸ Posted: 02 Apr 2001, 19:38 GMT
FOIA request filed this evening for flight activity, military exercise notices, and any weather-modification records covering the window listed above.

I included the airport codes and the observer times from the log. I will post only the receipt number and response dates when they arrive.
file the boring forms
K7RADIO
Veteran Member
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 10,110
Joined: Dec 1998
From: Arizona, US
#29▸ Posted: 29 Apr 2001, 20:04 GMT
For controls, please log clear-sky overflights too. Same observer, same location, same time block if possible.

A normal contrail that fades in under two minutes is useful here because it gives us a comparison against the spreading bands.
K7 · logs not throats
Hessdalen_Lars
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 5,210
Joined: Apr 1999
From: Trøndelag, NO
#30▸ Posted: 26 May 2001, 20:31 GMT
Agree on controls. In Hessdalen work we learned that one strange frame means little without quiet frames around it.

Please add camera direction, estimated elevation, and whether the trail crosses the sunward side or the opposite sky. That will help separate optics from plume behaviour.
Project Hessdalen · mark the clock
Mags_92
Member
◆◆
Posts: 610
Joined: Sep 2000
From: Northumberland, UK
#31▸ Posted: 22 Jun 2001, 21:07 GMT
Radio note: I checked my local VHF log against the 13:20 to 16:05 window. No matching interference, no repeatable squelch breaks, and no beacon dropouts.

That does not clear the sky event, but it means my station shows no radio correlation for today.
KJ7MAG -- log it or lose it
Cal_Ullman
Member
◆◆
Posts: 390
Joined: Feb 2001
From: Lincolnshire, UK
#32▸ Posted: 19 Jul 2001, 21:44 GMT
Weather note for the log: afternoon cirrus was already present before the reported passes, thin and fibrous, with gradual thickening after 15:00.

Humidity aloft may have favoured persistence. I would not call that a conclusion, just a condition to record beside the sightings.
clouds first, conclusions second
Page 4 of 5   «12345»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone