PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  DEEP POLITICS & BLACK PROJECTS  »  Weather Mod, Aerosols & Control Systems  »  Persistent contrails over a county corridor -- pattern not matching civil routes?
✎ Post Reply   « Weather Mod, Aerosols & Control Systems
Persistent contrails over a county corridor -- pattern not matching civil routes?
Page 3 of 5   «12345»
Mags_92
Member
◆◆
Posts: 610
Joined: Sep 2000
From: Northumberland, UK
#17▸ Posted: 12 Jun 2000, 07:33 GMT
LAMINAR_GHOST captions match my second noise burst. Static climbed again at 0647 and dropped at 0655.

Not proof of anything by itself, but it gives us a clock mark against the veil closing. Anyone with a scanner log near that time, compare before posting conclusions.
KJ7MAG -- log it or lose it
Cal_Ullman
Member
◆◆
Posts: 390
Joined: Feb 2001
From: Lincolnshire, UK
#18▸ Posted: 09 Jul 2000, 08:02 GMT
Morning sun angle confirms the spread layer is higher than the scattered low cloud moving in from the south. The trail sheet is shearing west to east while the low deck crawls north.

That is a proper two-level wind story, so today's control question is simple: who knew the upper lane would lay a lid before the forecast changed?
clouds first, conclusions second
LAMINAR_GHOST
Member
◆◆
Posts: 740
Joined: Jan 2002
From: the Midlands, UK
#19▸ Posted: 04 Aug 2000, 09:21 GMT
Updating my read on the packet. The third photo is not a second aircraft. I think it is the same trail seen after a turn in the road, with the treeline shifted left.

The bright lower streak is probably sun on ice haze, not a separate plume. Keeping the frame numbers matters because my first impression was wrong.
the sky is a ledger -- keep accounts
K7RADIO
Veteran Member
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 10,110
Joined: Dec 1998
From: Arizona, US
#20▸ Posted: 31 Aug 2000, 10:04 GMT
Agree on geometry. The photo set can tell us altitude angle, bearing drift, and whether the trail is persistent.

It cannot tell chemistry from a scan and a memory. Please do not build claims past what the frame supports.
K7 · logs not throats
Hessdalen_Lars
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 5,210
Joined: Apr 1999
From: Trøndelag, NO
#21▸ Posted: 27 Sep 2000, 11:37 GMT
Can the witnesses split timing into hard and soft?

Hard means watch time, receipt time, radio clock, answering-machine stamp. Soft means after breakfast, before school bus, near sunset. We need both, but marked clearly.
Project Hessdalen · mark the clock
Cal_Ullman
Member
◆◆
Posts: 390
Joined: Feb 2001
From: Lincolnshire, UK
#22▸ Posted: 24 Oct 2000, 13:18 GMT
Log entry. 16 Feb, 1542 to 1610 local, west ridge turnout. Two persistent trails crossed over the valley mouth.

Wind at ground was light from northwest. Upper drift looked east. No odour, no fallout seen. Photos on 35mm roll 12, frames 18 to 23.
clouds first, conclusions second
QuietHand
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 6,402
Joined: Mar 1999
From: undisclosed, US
#23▸ Posted: 19 Nov 2000, 14:02 GMT
Preserve the negatives. Preserve the envelopes from the lab. Do not trim borders.

Write witness name, date received, and who handled them on a separate sheet, not on the sleeve. If anyone mails copies, keep the mailing envelope too.
measure the load
MUFON_Gail
Field Researcher
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 8,044
Joined: Aug 1999
From: Ohio, US
#24▸ Posted: 16 Dec 2000, 15:46 GMT
I am starting a corridor FOIA request for the date range 15 to 17 Feb. Asking for military training routes, NOTAM changes, tanker activity summaries if releasable, and weather-balloon releases within 150 miles.

Keep reports factual so the request has clean anchors.
file the boring forms
Page 3 of 5   «12345»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone