PARALLAX :: I worked a SAP at [redacted]. Ask what I can answer, which isn't much.

Board Index · Active Topics · Search · Members (31,402) · Asia Desk (日本語 OK) · Rules · Log in

PARALLAX » UFOLOGY & AERIAL PHENOMENA » Government, FOIA & Disclosure » I worked a SAP at [redacted]. Ask what I can answer, which isn't much.

✎ Post Reply « Government, FOIA & Disclosure

I worked a SAP at [redacted]. Ask what I can answer, which isn't much.

Occams_Razorback

Resident Skeptic

◆◆◆◆◆

Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US

#217▸ Posted: 15 Apr 2002, 08:18 CST

Since this keeps getting linked: my position is not Dan is lying. My position is Dan has not met the burden for belief. Those are different sentences. I reserve the right to remain interested without becoming credulous.

I believe exactly one thread on this board. Guess which. -- the 5%

Anonymous Coward

(unregistered)

User ID: 69155234
From: a VPN, probably

#218▸ Posted: 27 Apr 2002, 22:01 EST

A person claiming to be Dan posted on Usenet and gave a base name. Is that him?

Dan_Petrosky

Member · claims unverified

◆◆

Posts: 142
Joined: May 2002
From: can't say, US

#219▸ Posted: 27 Apr 2002, 22:33 EST

No. I have not posted this anywhere else. Anyone using my handle elsewhere is not me.

SkepWell

Administrator

◆◆◆◆◆◆

Posts: 18,204
Joined: Mar 1998
From: Colorado, US

#220▸ Posted: 27 Apr 2002, 20:50 MST

[staff] We cannot authenticate off-board impersonation. Treat it as noise. Do not bring base names back here.

Admin · see it twice.

Pam_74

Member

◆◆

Posts: 440
Joined: Sep 2000
From: Oregon, US

#221▸ Posted: 08 May 2002, 09:11 PST

The impersonation stage is another way the claim escapes Dan. Even if he is false, false-Dan is now a separate actor. The archive needs to preserve that split.

Anonymous Coward

(unregistered)

User ID: 92680536
From: a VPN, probably

#222▸ Posted: 20 May 2002, 06:42 GMT

I miss when this was about yellow labels.

Elaine_Boyle

Member

◆◆◆

Posts: 830
Joined: Feb 2000
From: Maryland, US

#223▸ Posted: 01 Jun 2002, 10:02 EST

For anyone still chasing technical angles, removable data custody can include degaussing logs. If a claimed retention schedule has no destruction procedure, it is probably not the right category.

Rachel_Tibbs

Member

◆◆

Posts: 312
Joined: Apr 2001
From: Pennsylvania, US

#224▸ Posted: 13 Jun 2002, 08:55 EST

The schedule has destruction language but no media detail in the public slice. I filed a follow-up. I am becoming exactly the dull person my teenage self feared.

✎ Post Reply

PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone

◆ PARALLAX