 Resident Skeptic ◆◆◆◆◆ Posts: 16,720 Joined: Apr 1998 From: Chicago, US |
#33▸ Posted: 28 Apr 1998, 09:15 CST
TrustNo1, you've just explained away every sighting on the board with one theory. Anything in the sky that isn't ordinary aviation is now "Blue Beam." That isn't investigation -- it's a belief that can never be wrong. Can you describe the physics of projecting a kilometre-wide image that also appears solid to radar? Or are we accepting it because it sounds plausible and it's frightening?
--OR |
Anonymous Coward  (unregistered) User ID: 17231705 From: a VPN, probably |
#34▸ Posted: 06 Jul 1998, 16:31 EST
I've tracked sightings in the Midwest for eight years. Real ones -- intelligent movement, multiple independent witnesses with no connection to each other. And now every time I post, a Blue Beam zealot turns up to tell me I just saw a NASA hologram test. That's not skepticism, it's dogma with a different flag. Not every anomaly is your hologram. Some of us are trying to do actual fieldwork here, and Blue Beam eats it.
frustrated |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 3,410 Joined: Feb 2001 From: [you first] |
#35▸ Posted: 07 Jul 1998, 02:14 EST
If your sightings are "intelligent" and "real," then they're either extraterrestrial (which means contact the government hides), or our own black tech (also hidden), or Blue Beam tests (which explains the secrecy AND the pattern). In an age of total surveillance you can't have open alien visitation. The most parsimonious of the three is the test apparatus. It isn't an insult to your fieldwork. It's the framework your fieldwork fits into.
the only three options |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 9,980 Joined: Jan 2000 From: Missouri, US |
#36▸ Posted: 22 Aug 1998, 20:56 EST
Sixteen months to the new year. I'm watching the UN meetings, the military exercises, the aerospace contracts. Something is building. The big show comes when the public is panicked enough to accept a unified world government, and Y2K is the psychological moment. I pray I'm wrong. I don't think I am.
countdown |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 1,840 Joined: Feb 2001 From: Washington DC, US |
#37▸ Posted: 23 Aug 1998, 14:28 PST
I keep returning to the same problem. If the show happens in 2000, the theory wins. If it doesn't, believers will say it was postponed, or exposed and stopped, or moved to 2005, or buried in a black budget. There is no outcome that falsifies it. That isn't how a prediction works -- that's how an unfalsifiable mythology works. And no one here has answered it; they've only restated the faith more loudly.
--PN |
Anonymous Coward  (unregistered) User ID: 97562899 From: a VPN, probably |
#38▸ Posted: 29 Dec 1998, 03:22 EST
I'm not a Blue Beam believer, but I'll admit something: I'm a little scared of the opposite. If nothing happens on 1 January 2000, the world will feel strangely deflated. We've been told something enormous is coming. If it's just... more ordinary life, more Tuesdays -- that's almost more frightening than a conspiracy. At least the conspiracy means someone is in charge.
|
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 380 Joined: May 2000 From: Lincolnshire, UK |
#39▸ Posted: 14 Dec 1999, 18:33 GMT
The millennial fever is at its peak. Every grid anomaly, every satellite glitch, every odd noise is being posted as "Phase One." I've gone back through the proposed projection specs again. The equipment would be detectable -- power signatures, emissions, infrastructure. We don't see it. But evidence won't matter in the next fortnight. People want something big to be coming, and want is louder than data right now.
--RR |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 9,980 Joined: Jan 2000 From: Missouri, US |
#40▸ Posted: 31 Dec 1999, 22:14 EST
FINAL HOURS. The grids are holding so far. But the night is young. The sky show can still come at midnight; the holographic messiah can still appear when society is fractured by the rollover. Watch the sky. Document everything. The next few hours decide the course of history.
this is it |