PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  DEEP POLITICS & BLACK PROJECTS  »  Deep Politics & Domestic Operations  »  Project Blue Beam -- NASA's fake-messiah hologram plan (the founding debate)
✎ Post Reply   « Deep Politics & Domestic Operations
Project Blue Beam -- NASA's fake-messiah hologram plan (the founding debate)
Page 1 of 8   12378»
doomwatch_2012
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 9,980
Joined: Jan 2000
From: Missouri, US
#1▸ Posted: 14 Nov 1995, 02:47 EST
Project Blue Beam -- NASA's fake-messiah hologram plan (let's actually examine this)

I know this sounds insane. I've read Serge Monast's work and I want to lay it out plainly so we can actually look at it instead of dismissing it. NASA and the UN are preparing a global deception. Four stages. This is, according to Monast, documented.

STAGE ONE: Staged earthquakes along fault lines -- tectonic weapons. These earthquakes unearth "archaeological discoveries" at major religious sites, engineered to produce evidence that discredits the historical basis of every world religion at once. Global. The world's faith systems collapse overnight.

STAGE TWO: The Big Space Show. A holographic projection visible from every point on Earth simultaneously. Not a blurry thing -- a coherent image. Each culture sees their own messiah. Christians see Christ, Muslims see the Mahdi, Hindus see Krishna. It all merges into ONE image -- a New Age savior for a unified world government.

STAGE THREE: The Voice of God. Satellites and ground stations with microwave and ELF capability project voices directly into your head. Not from outside -- INSIDE your mind. You hear God. Or aliens. Whoever they want. This is the microwave auditory effect, and it is real.

STAGE FOUR: Faked supernatural events by electronic means. A simulated rapture. A simulated alien invasion. Mass panic. Humanity stampedes toward the savior they just showed in the sky, and the New World Order is finalized.

I'm not saying I have the satellite serial numbers. But the framework is there. Monast had sources. And everything fits. Does anyone else see this, or am I alone here?
--doomwatch
Occams_Razorback
Resident Skeptic
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US
#2▸ Posted: 15 Nov 1995, 04:23 CST
Okay. Let's actually examine this, starting with Stage Two, because it's the linchpin and it's also physically impossible.

A hologram is a recording of a light field. To VIEW one you need a medium -- a surface to scatter the light back to your eye. The open sky is not a screen. There is nothing up there to hold a coherent image. You cannot project a solid three-dimensional figure onto empty air and have it seen, at the same angle, from the North Pole and Tokyo and Chicago at once. That isn't optics. That's fantasy.

Could you throw a 2D image onto a cloud? Sure -- clouds scatter light. But clouds are local. Clouds over Chicago are not clouds over London, and a smear of light on a cloud is a light show, not a god that every culture reads as their own.

You say satellites do this. Show me the constellation. The power budget. The math on coherence over twelve thousand miles of atmosphere. I'll wait.
radar_Reg
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 380
Joined: May 2000
From: Lincolnshire, UK
#3▸ Posted: 15 Nov 1995, 05:09 GMT
Occams is right, and I'll add the engineering. RAF, comms and systems. A satellite network powerful enough to put an image on the ground would need multi-megawatt transmitters in orbit -- the thermal signature alone would be tracked by every SIGINT agency on Earth. We would see the launches. We would see the insertions.

And coherence over distance is HARD. The same image seen from New York and New Delhi means signal path lengths differing by thousands of kilometres; the phase relationships fall apart. It is why we do not have satellite-based projection of anything, let alone a sky-wide messiah.

If this network existed, there would be infrastructure. Telemetry. Emissions. Debris. Something. There is nothing.
--RR
K7RADIO
Veteran Member
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 10,110
Joined: Dec 1998
From: Arizona, US
#4▸ Posted: 15 Nov 1995, 06:58 MST
On the "voice of God" claim, since that's my end. Ham, Arizona. I've read Frey's work on the microwave auditory effect.

What Frey actually showed: pulsed microwaves at certain frequencies produce CLICKS and BUZZES near the antenna -- a thermal effect in the inner ear. Not words. Not language. To beam intelligible SPEECH into one chosen head across a continent you'd need a transmitter that could target a single skull from orbit (an antenna farm, not a satellite) AND a brain that decodes microwave pulses into English, which is not how brains work.

The phenomenon is real. The application Monast describes is wishful thinking bolted onto a real effect. That's the tell.
--K7
doomwatch_2012
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 9,980
Joined: Jan 2000
From: Missouri, US
#5▸ Posted: 15 Nov 1995, 08:34 EST
Okay. I hear the objections. But you're all assuming it has to work by conventional means.

They don't need satellites we can detect. They have HAARP. HAARP manipulates the ionosphere -- the upper atmosphere becomes the transmitter, the screen. Ionize a layer of air and project onto that. You can't hide it because it's everywhere and it looks like research.

And maybe Frey's published results were the suppressed version. Maybe the classified work went twenty years further. That's how it works -- the military runs decades ahead of the journals.

The exact mechanism doesn't matter. The INTENT does. The UN pushing for global governance, the churches compromised, NASA as the technology vector. The pieces fit.
--doomwatch
Praxis_Null
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 1,840
Joined: Feb 2001
From: Washington DC, US
#6▸ Posted: 15 Nov 1995, 09:27 PST
I want to flag the epistemology, because doomwatch just moved the goalposts in real time. The claim was "satellites with holograms." Shown that's impossible, it became "HAARP ionospheric projection." Ask for evidence of that, and the answer will be "it's hidden" or "suppressed."

This is unfalsifiable by design. If the event happens, it confirms the theory. If it doesn't, "they postponed it." If a strange thing appears in the sky, "a test." If nothing appears, "compartmentalization." The theory eats all evidence AND all counter-evidence.

I'm not saying it's false. I'm saying it is built so that it cannot be shown false. That is the red flag.
--PN
radar_Reg
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 380
Joined: May 2000
From: Lincolnshire, UK
#7▸ Posted: 16 Nov 1995, 10:04 GMT
On HAARP specifically: it is a real facility, or will be when finished. High-frequency active auroral research. It bounces radio off the ionosphere to STUDY the ionosphere. It is an instrument, not a projector.

Ionospheric plasma is diffuse; particles scatter light chaotically. You get the aurora -- pretty colours -- not a coherent deity visible from six continents. And the power to try would show up on the grid, in the fuel shipments, in the construction. It's in Alaska. People drive past it.

This isn't suppressed. It's impossible.
--RR
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 43176615
From: a VPN, probably
#8▸ Posted: 16 Nov 1995, 11:15 EST
New here, and I don't know the tech, but: why would they do this at all? If the UN wanted a one-world government, why the hologram? They have armies. They have nukes. Why the fake god? It seems like a lot of extra steps.
Page 1 of 8   12378»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone