 Administrator ◆◆◆◆◆◆ Posts: 18,204 Joined: Mar 1998 From: Colorado, US |
#17▸ Posted: 21 Jun 1999, 10:25 MST
[staff] Larry, that is exactly backwards. A utility easement, if real, proves an easement, not a destination.
Digger, when you get the scan, include county, book/page or map number, recording date, and whether the grantee is a utility, private landowner, or agency. One checkable detail beats ten spooky nouns.
Admin · see it twice. |
 Member ◆◆ Posts: 6,402 Joined: Jan 2001 From: a bunker, spiritually |
#18▸ Posted: 23 Aug 1999, 13:05 EST
HAHA NOW IT IS "JUST AN EASEMENT". FUNNY HOW THE PAPER TRAIL IS ALWAYS "THIN" UNTIL THE RIGHT PEOPLE NEED IT TO VANISH.
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. COUNTY CLERKS DO NOT FILE NIGHTMARE HALL UNDER NIGHTMARE HALL.
WAKE UP |
 Senior Member ◆◆◆◆ Posts: 2,710 Joined: Oct 1999 From: Maryland, US |
#19▸ Posted: 24 Oct 1999, 10:30 PST
WakeUP, compartmented programs can leave boring administrative traces, but that does not make every ambiguous trace part of a compartmented program. The declassified material on Bennewitz shows how a false narrative can be steered through real offices and real people.
That is why Digger's distinction matters. A recorded easement could be mundane, could be misindexed, or could point to infrastructure worth mapping. It cannot carry Castello by itself.
declassified only · Maryland |
Anonymous Coward  (unregistered) User ID: 14351069 From: a VPN, probably |
#20▸ Posted: 26 Dec 1999, 13:44 EST
check the plat overlays
|
 Field Researcher ◆◆◆◆ Posts: 9,120 Joined: May 1999 From: New Mexico, US |
#21▸ Posted: 27 Feb 2000, 12:10 MST
SkepWell, yes: county, book/page or map number, recording date, and named party if the copy gives them. If it is only an index stub, I will say that plainly.
Pete and Rey are both landing where I am. Infrastructure can be real without the folklore being real. Larry and WakeUP can call that evasive, but I am not going to launder a bad chain of custody through a better-looking county form.
documents over rumour · New Mexico |
 Senior Member ◆◆◆◆ Posts: 3,980 Joined: Jul 2000 From: Alice Springs, AU |
#22▸ Posted: 30 Apr 2000, 07:10 ACST
On Marta's point about records looking patchy: that is normal around remote infrastructure. You can have odd easements, repeater sites, and access tracks without importing aliens into the same paragraph.
Antennas and leases first. Monsters and firefights can wait outside until they bring paperwork.
Alice Springs · antennas and aliens in separate paragraphs |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 3,410 Joined: Feb 2001 From: [you first] |
#23▸ Posted: 02 Jul 2000, 23:05 EST
SkepWell, that standard is exactly how a limited hangout works. one checkable detail, one little utility/easement map anomaly, and everyone feels sober while the Level 7 material gets memory-holed as if the only poison in the trail is the parts you don't like.
who benefits from narrowing Dulce to county filing errors and cattle residue? same people who built the Bennewitz/Doty channel and then taught everyone to fear the word underground.
who benefits · narrowing is the trick |
 Member ◆ Posts: 222 Joined: Jan 2002 From: below, obviously |
#24▸ Posted: 03 Sep 2000, 23:09 EST
thread title should be "Dulce -- separating the boring papers from Level 7, the only real subject."
DulceDigger can scan the easement map all night. Nightmare Hall still pays rent in his head.
|