 Member ◆◆ Posts: 203 Joined: Jul 2001 From: the kitchen, near the window |
#1▸ Posted: 21 Aug 2000, 07:06 GMT
I have been looking at the placement of cordless phone base stations in ordinary houses. Not mobile phones. Not towers. The cheap beige domestic base units, especially the ones everyone puts near the kitchen window because that is where the socket is.
Something is happening there.
A kitchen window is already a surveillance membrane. You look out, neighbours look in, street movement enters the home as low-grade social pressure. Add a cordless base station producing a constant domestic RF field, then add family routines around cooking, bills, arguments, and phone calls. The result is a behavioural conditioning node.
I have no proof in the legal sense. I have pattern.
In houses where the phone base is near the kitchen window, people answer questions faster and with more socially acceptable lies. 'Fine.' 'No problem.' 'Just tired.' 'We should invite them.' The kitchen becomes a little embassy of the outside world. People self-edit there.
In houses where the phone base is in a hallway, people seem more irritable but more honest. In bedrooms, it creates dream contamination. In studies, it produces obsessional paperwork. This is not Feng Shui. It is signal ecology.
Possible mechanism:
- Low-level RF field entrains attention around the device. - Ring anticipation creates intermittent reward stress. - Window-facing placement binds the device to external observation. - Family members learn compliance scripts in that spatial zone. - Over time the room itself becomes an obedience field.
The sinister possibility is that intelligence services never needed a mind-control ray. They only needed manufacturers to normalize certain device placements inside domestic ritual spaces.
Please test: move your cordless base station away from any window for seven days. Do not tell your family why. Record whether arguments change location.
signal ecology, not feng shui |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 1,320 Joined: Oct 2001 From: Minneapolis MN, US |
#2▸ Posted: 13 Sep 2000, 08:18 GMT
The useful part is not the ray but the script. A phone by a window creates a tiny witness stand -- caller, street, sink, family traffic, and the expected voice all arriving at once.
I would trim the mechanism list to anticipation plus performative domesticity before adding carrier waves.
architecture remembers what bodies pretend to forget |
 Veteran Member ◆◆◆◆◆ Posts: 10,110 Joined: Dec 1998 From: Arizona, US |
#3▸ Posted: 07 Oct 2000, 10:44 GMT
A cordless base is not bathing the room in anything remotely like a mind-control field. The transmit power is small, intermittent depending on standard, and 1.9 GHz is mostly going to be boring old RF propagation with walls, bodies, and water doing predictable things.
That said, the object can still train behaviour because it rings, it has a place, and everyone knows where to perform being reasonable.
73, measure twice |
 Member ◆◆ Posts: 310 Joined: Sep 2000 From: Reading, UK |
#4▸ Posted: 30 Oct 2000, 13:02 GMT
Small correction: many beige ones here are not 1.9 GHz DECT but older 43/46 MHz, 900 MHz, or 2.4 GHz sets, depending on country and age. DECT base stations do beacon, but the power budget is still not the story packet_witch wants it to be.
The charger cradle, wall socket, and nearest flat surface are probably stronger determinants than the modulation.
mind the timeslots |
 Member ◆ Posts: 66 Joined: Dec 2001 From: Norwich, UK |
#5▸ Posted: 22 Nov 2000, 19:27 GMT
Moved ours from the kitchen window to the hall table last night. Result so far: nobody lied more or less, but everyone now blocks the stairs while saying they are just popping out for five minutes.
Hallway honesty may simply be because there is nowhere to stand comfortably while maintaining a falsehood.
floorplans are family law |
 Member ◆ Posts: 41 Joined: Aug 2002 From: Ohio, US |
#6▸ Posted: 16 Dec 2000, 15:36 GMT
Installer note: these things end up by kitchen windows because that is where the phone socket, power outlet, and wipe-clean ledge all accidentally agree. I have watched households invent explanations for a base station that were really about a six foot lead.
no dial tone, no theory |
 Member ◆◆ Posts: 205 Joined: Apr 2001 From: Leicester, UK |
#7▸ Posted: 08 Jan 2001, 09:51 GMT
If people are testing this, time something boring. Seconds between ring and first answer, seconds before the first apology phrase, and room where the first contradiction happens.
Arguments are too poetic as a unit. Count relocations: kitchen to hall, hall to sitting room, sitting room to slammed door.
timestamps or it dissolves |
 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 642 Joined: Jan 2001 From: a regional ISP, formerly |
#8▸ Posted: 31 Jan 2001, 22:08 GMT
There is also the board-operation version of this: objects placed as infrastructure become social sensors even when they are electrically innocent. Logs, bells, kitchen phones, admin panels -- all make people tidy their story for the nearest implied observer.
No flame intended. I just think the leak may be household procedure, not household radiation.
null route, clean hands |