PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  CRYPTOZOOLOGY  »  North American Cryptids  »  Mothman -- Point Pleasant anniversary field notes (no, I didn't see it)
✎ Post Reply   « North American Cryptids
Mothman -- Point Pleasant anniversary field notes (no, I didn't see it)
Page 1 of 12   1231112»
Mothman_PP
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 1,510
Joined: Aug 2000
From: West Virginia, US
#1▸ Posted: 15 Nov 1996, 21:47 EST
Thirty years to the day. November 15, 1966 -- two cars on the TNT road, near the old explosives plant, north of here. I wasn't there. My grandmother was somewhere in Point Pleasant that night, or close to it. She never said where, and she never said what she saw, but her sister told me once that she came home that night and wouldn't ride past the TNT area again. Not once in the next thirty years.

I'm starting this thread because someone should mark the date. Not to claim I saw anything -- I didn't. Not to say my grandmother saw anything -- she wouldn't say. But the sightings in '66 and the year after were real events, real reports, real enough that people still remember. The couples who were out there, whoever they were, whatever they saw. The others who came forward.

If anyone here has any real memories, or if your families do, I'd like to know. No wild talk. Just what happened.
Point Pleasant · I keep the anniversary, that's all
Hexenring
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 1,290
Joined: Nov 2000
From: Bavaria, DE
#2▸ Posted: 23 Nov 1996, 23:12 CET
I'm reading about this for the first time, from here in Bavaria. Your grandmother's silence says something. Keel wrote about this, yes? The book came to me two years ago. What strikes me is not whether a creature was there, but where it chose to appear -- at the boundary of the town, at an industrial ruin, in the dark, near a place made for destruction and then left empty. These are the places where the folk traditions always said something lived, or came through. The margins.

The creature may be nothing. But the location is everything.
-- H.
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 40861429
From: a VPN, probably
#3▸ Posted: 02 Dec 1996, 01:33 EST
My uncle drove that road in October, weeks before, with two friends. He never said he saw anything, but he came home strange, and my father told me years later that Uncle wouldn't go near the TNT area after that. Wouldn't explain why. I never asked him. He's still here in Point Pleasant. Still won't talk about it. But he knows something happened, that much I'm sure of.
Cascade_Cat
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 3,110
Joined: Aug 1999
From: Oregon, US
#4▸ Posted: 10 Dec 1996, 03:47 PST
The sandhill crane theory is sound. Large birds, wingspan can reach six or seven feet when the wings are spread. They have red coloring around the eyes, especially in breeding season or in certain light -- infrared reflection, eyeshine off a flashlight in the dark could read as glowing red. A startled crane can be aggressive, territorial. If two cars came around a bend at night and surprised a bird, it would chase them. The witnesses were frightened, adrenaline was high, memories can shape themselves into something larger.

This isn't to dismiss them. It's to start with what we know lives in West Virginia.
C.
Mothman_PP
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 1,510
Joined: Aug 2000
From: West Virginia, US
#5▸ Posted: 18 Dec 1996, 07:22 EST
The crane explanation makes sense. Sandhill cranes do come through here. The Scarberrys and Mallettes -- those are the names of the first couples -- they were young, it was late, it was dark. A large bird, fear, the particular way headlights move over a shape in the road. I'm not dismissing Cascade_Cat's reading. But the fact of the reports stands: over a hundred people reported something, over the next thirteen months. A crane would have moved on. Whatever they were seeing, or thought they were seeing, it stayed.
SquatchFieldNotes
Field Researcher
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 7,330
Joined: Nov 1999
From: Washington, US
#6▸ Posted: 27 Dec 1996, 10:15 PST
I keep a record. The Mothman reports are in the archive. Over one hundred reports, yes, with clustering in Point Pleasant proper and along the TNT road, and then spreading further out, more diffuse, over November 1966 through roughly December 1967. The reports changed shape over time -- early reports were of the creature being seen directly, later reports were of things flying overhead, or sounds, or the sense of being watched. The most credible accounts are the early ones, the direct sightings. After that, the data gets murkier. This is true of every cryptid phenomenon I've studied. The signal degrades.

What's worth preserving is what the first witnesses actually said.
SFN
Hexenring
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 1,290
Joined: Nov 2000
From: Bavaria, DE
#7▸ Posted: 04 Jan 1997, 14:33 CET
The degradation SquatchFieldNotes describes -- this is the folklore pattern. A real event, a real sighting of something unknown, generates a true report. Then the report spreads, and people begin to see what they expect to see, having heard the story. The creature becomes a story. The story becomes a template. In the Harz, in the Black Forest, we see this exact pattern with the Wildman sightings of the medieval period. One report, then a hundred, then they fade because the initial oddness is absorbed into local knowledge. The creature becomes part of how people understand their own landscape.

Point Pleasant integrated the Mothman into its own territory. Whether or not a creature caused the first sighting, the sighting itself changed what Point Pleasant is.
-- H.
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 65190776
From: a VPN, probably
#8▸ Posted: 12 Jan 1997, 16:54 EST
My mother worked at the Lowe's Hotel then, downtown. She remembers Mrs. Hyre coming in, the reporter, asking questions of the staff about whether anyone else had seen it. That was after the first reports got out. Mrs. Hyre was serious about it, not mocking. She was trying to understand what her town had witnessed. That matters. That a journalist took it seriously enough to ask careful questions. Not saying she proved anything. But she gave the sightings dignity.
Page 1 of 12   1231112»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone