PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  CRYPTOZOOLOGY  »  Tracks, Casts & Field Evidence  »  Trail-cam settings for nocturnal large mammals (and IR they can't see)
✎ Post Reply   « Tracks, Casts & Field Evidence
Trail-cam settings for nocturnal large mammals (and IR they can't see)
Page 1 of 2   12»
trailcam_Tony
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 2,870
Joined: Mar 2000
From: Pennsylvania, US
#1▸ Posted: 20 Apr 2000, 08:00 EST
Trail-cam settings thread because i am genuinely tired of seeing the same three mistakes turn deer into bigfoot.

one. you hung it too high, angled down at your eye level, so everything is a grey lump. hang it at the ANIMAL's eye line, low, level. two. your IR flash is blowing out anything within ten feet to a featureless white ghost -- back it off or move the cam further from the trail. three. you've got it on single-shot so the one spooky frame has no before and no after. BURST MODE. always. three frames minimum. the number of "figures" that resolve into a deer's backside on frame 2 would astonish you.

and if youre serious, 940nm IR is much darker to most animals than 850nm, worth the extra money. my actual settings are below, steal them, no credit needed.
11 cams, 4 frames I can't explain, 0 I'll oversell
K7RADIO
Veteran Member
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 10,110
Joined: Dec 1998
From: Arizona, US
#2▸ Posted: 12 May 2000, 08:31 MST
Thank you. The camera is part of the measuring apparatus and people treat it like a lucky charm they nail to a tree. If the trigger delay is two seconds and the animal is walking, your "mystery figure" is already leaving the frame before the first exposure starts.

Tony, post the exact delay/sensitivity/burst settings you use on the cheap units. Half the board owns the same two plastic bricks from the farm store and pretends they are lab instruments.
build your own gear
Ben_94
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: May 2002
From: upstate NY, US
#3▸ Posted: 04 Jun 2000, 10:02 EST
My cheap setup after ruining a whole autumn: low mount, level not angled, three-shot burst, thirty second quiet period, medium sensitivity, no bait pile closer than fifteen feet. I also put a stick in the ground at known height in the first test shot so later i know whether a "seven foot thing" is actually four feet and uphill.

Also wipe the spider webs off the front. I know that sounds insulting. It is insulting because I learned it by being insulted by a spider web for three weeks.
frame 2 tells on frame 1
Paula_Kessler
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sep 2002
From: Pennsylvania, US
#4▸ Posted: 27 Jun 2000, 11:14 EST
Ok then please laugh at me constructively. This was from behind my sister's place in Potter County. We all said "person in a sheet" when we first saw it because it looks upright and pale, but there is a second shot two seconds later where it is lower and I think maybe deer? I am posting the bad frame because it is the one everyone gets excited about.
Potter County, behind my sister's place. This is the spooky frame, not the useful one. -- Paula
bad cameras, honest questions
trailcam_Tony
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 2,870
Joined: Mar 2000
From: Pennsylvania, US
#5▸ Posted: 19 Jul 2000, 11:40 EST
Not laughing. This is exactly the kind of frame worth posting because it teaches the mistake. It is a deer close to the lens, head down and turning away, with IR bloom wiping the body edge. You can see the near foreleg as the grey vertical on the left and the rump as the big pale sheet. Frame two will be the answer, which is why frame two matters.

Also: your cam is too high and angled down. Lower it about a foot and point it level across the trail, not at the ground. You will get fewer ghosts and more boring deer, which is the goal.
11 cams, 4 frames I can't explain, 0 I'll oversell
dogman_Dewey
Member
◆◆
Posts: 1,290
Joined: Jan 2001
From: Wisconsin, US
#6▸ Posted: 10 Aug 2000, 12:03 CST
not dogman. wrong line, no muzzle, no shoulder. deer doing deer garbage near a bad light. tony is right.

still keep the after frames. even a bad deer frame teaches. better than the fake "wolf man" pic that comes round every october and wastes my whole weekend.
just dogman, do NOT @ me about squatch
Cascade_Cat
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 3,110
Joined: Aug 1999
From: Oregon, US
#7▸ Posted: 02 Sep 2000, 10:27 PST
Add one old-woods thing to Tony's list: put the camera where the animal already wants to pass, not where you want the photo to happen. Pinch point, mud edge, trail junction, low saddle. If you force the camera onto a dramatic-looking tree and the animals are skirting twenty yards left, all you have built is a shrine to your own hopes.

Sign first, camera second. Always.
sign first, camera second
bf_skeptic_Stan
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Jan 2000
From: Michigan, US
#8▸ Posted: 25 Sep 2000, 13:08 EST
The low-level mount also fixes the bear problem. High downward angle shortens the body, hides the ears, and turns a bear standing half-up at a log into a "tall biped" if you are already excited. Put the lens where the animal lives, not where your human eyes live.

And no, 940nm IR is not invisible magic. It is just less obvious. Animals still notice the box sometimes because the box smells like you.
no body, no biology
Page 1 of 2   12»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone