PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  DEEP POLITICS & BLACK PROJECTS  »  Black Projects & Suppressed Tech  »  Nazi flying saucers -- occult myth, Paperclip cover story, or suppressed aeronautics?
✎ Post Reply   « Black Projects & Suppressed Tech
Nazi flying saucers -- occult myth, Paperclip cover story, or suppressed aeronautics?
Page 1 of 5   12345»
Archivist_23
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 2,210
Joined: Jun 2000
From: Koblenz, DE
#1▸ Posted: 23 Feb 1997, 01:48 GMT
Before anyone posts the usual photocopied "Haunebu III" diagrams from some badly stapled UFO zine, let's separate three things:

1. Documented German advanced weapons research
2. Postwar Allied exploitation of German scientists
3. The later myth-complex of Nazi saucers, Antarctic bases, and occult propulsion

The mistake skeptics make is dismissing all three because the third is ridiculous. The mistake believers make is treating the first two as proof of the third.

Known baseline:

- Germany had serious rocket, jet, swept-wing, and guided weapons programs.
- Operation Paperclip moved German technical expertise into US programs.
- The Horten brothers were working with unconventional aircraft designs.
- Viktor Schauberger's implosion/turbine ideas were real enough as biographical material, even if later claims around them became wildly inflated.
- Postwar saucer sightings exploded precisely when captured German aeronautical knowledge and early Cold War secrecy overlapped.

Now the question:

Did "Nazi flying saucers" begin as a literal aircraft program, or as a camouflage myth used by Allied and Soviet intelligence to conceal captured research?

I think the saucer mythology has three layers:

Layer 1 -- Real advanced German aeronautics
Jets, rockets, lifting bodies, swept wings, circular-wing experiments, vertical takeoff fantasies.

Layer 2 -- Allied intelligence laundering
Captured projects reappear as rumours, dead-end diagrams, occult whispers, and contradictory witness accounts. This creates a fog bank around what was actually taken.

Layer 3 -- Esoteric infection
Postwar occultists, neo-Nazis, contactees, and South America/Antarctica fantasists attach Vril, Thule, Aldebaran, hollow earth, etc.

The result is a self-defending myth. Skeptics attack the occult garbage. Believers retreat to Paperclip. Nobody cleanly maps the middle layer.

Questions:

- Were any circular-wing or disc-shaped prototypes actually tested in Germany, Italy, Canada, or the US from 1943--1955?
- Did Allied intelligence deliberately encourage "Nazi saucer" stories to hide boring-but-important aerodynamic work?
- Why do so many later UFO motifs mirror wartime secret weapons rumours?
- Are the Antarctic claims pure fantasy, or postwar ratline displacement narratives mapped onto geography?

Suggested reading trail:

- Operation Paperclip documentation
- Horten aircraft development
- Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar
- Early CIA / Air Force UFO files
- Project Sign, Grudge, Blue Book
- Postwar German scientist transfers
- South American ratline investigations
- Occult revival material, but treated as contamination layer, not evidence

Working hypothesis:

The Nazi saucer is not a machine. It is a fossil imprint left in the public imagination by captured aerospace research, intelligence misdirection, Cold War paranoia, and occult fascist wish-fulfilment.

But fossil imprints still tell us something about the animal that made them.
the saucer is a fossil, not a machine
Rey_Sayers
Senior Member
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 2,710
Joined: Oct 1999
From: Maryland, US
#2▸ Posted: 14 Mar 1997, 02:05 GMT
I like the three-layer split because it gives us a control sample. The Avrocar and Project 1794 are the yardstick: documented funding, drawings, test reports, public cancellation, and performance that never came close to the legend.

If somebody wants to move a German disc from layer 3 to layer 1, they need the same kind of paper trail. Contract, wind-tunnel note, material order, test memo, pilot report, crash board. A rumour with rivets drawn on it is still a rumour.
declassified or it did not happen
Horten_Hilda
Member
◆◆
Posts: 470
Joined: Jul 2001
From: Bremen, DE
#3▸ Posted: 03 Apr 1997, 02:22 GMT
The aviation-history context matters. German designers absolutely explored odd planforms: Hortens, Lippisch deltas, annular-wing concepts on paper, ramjets, lifting bodies, all the desperate late-war shortcuts. That does not make every postwar saucer story a buried prototype.

The better pattern is boring but real: paper aircraft, component experiments, partial mockups, and Allied teams sorting the useful from the fantasy after the collapse. Circular-wing proposals existed in the broader design culture. The leap from that to operational Haunebu fleets is where the archive goes silent.
librarian, not priestess
WroclawWatcher
Member
◆◆
Posts: 640
Joined: Mar 2001
From: Wrocław, PL
#4▸ Posted: 22 Apr 1997, 02:43 GMT
Do not leave the Soviet side out of layer 2. The Red Army took factories, personnel, drawings, machine tools, and test articles from the eastern zones. They did the same triage as the Americans and British: rockets, swept wings, engines, radar, guidance.

If there had been a mature disc program in Silesia or Prague with repeatable performance, I would expect some trace in Soviet captured-tech exploitation, even if distorted. What I see instead are fragments: German engineers absorbed into normal aerospace problems, not a hidden saucer lineage.
reading the other filing cabinets
DulceDigger
Field Researcher
◆◆◆◆
Posts: 9,120
Joined: May 1999
From: New Mexico, US
#5▸ Posted: 12 May 1997, 03:02 GMT
Antarctica reads to me as displacement. It relocates the ratline anxiety somewhere blank on the map, far away from names, ports, church networks, intelligence handlers, and the very ordinary paper that actually follows fugitives.

Paperclip and the ratlines are already strange enough without ice bases. If a claim cannot survive a passenger list, custody memo, interrogation file, employment record, or property transfer, sending it south does not make it stronger. It just makes it harder to check.
documents over rumour · show me the folder number
Hexenring
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 1,290
Joined: Nov 2000
From: Bavaria, DE
#6▸ Posted: 31 May 1997, 03:18 GMT
Folklore is data, but not evidence in the engineering sense. Vril, Thule, secret priestesses, polar gates, black suns -- these are motifs clustering around defeated-power nostalgia and Cold War saucer panic.

The occult layer contaminates backwards. Later tellers borrow real names from German science and intelligence history to give myth a serial number. That tells us something about belief transmission. It does not tell us a disc ever left a hangar.
myths have fingerprints
Occams_Razorback
Resident Skeptic
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US
#7▸ Posted: 20 Jun 1997, 22:44 CST
OP has the only model here that does not require a miracle. Layer 1: real advanced weapons and weird prototypes. Layer 2: Allied and Soviet exploitation, plus quiet employment of useful people. Layer 3: garbage accreted by magazines, contactees, grifters, and true believers.

Could intelligence people have let saucer rumours run because they blurred real aircraft programs? Sure. That is plausible. But plausible cover noise is not proof that the noisy object existed.
extraordinary claims need ordinary paperwork first
xX_WakeUP_Xx
Member
◆◆
Posts: 6,402
Joined: Jan 2001
From: a bunker, spiritually
#8▸ Posted: 09 Jul 1997, 04:02 GMT
HAUNEBU IS REAL AND YOU PEOPLE ARE STILL ARGUING ABOUT FILE CABINETS LIKE THE FILES WERE NOT CLEANED BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.

VRIL DRIVE. ANTARCTICA. PAPERCLIP WAS THE FRONT DOOR. THE REAL DOOR WAS UNDER THE ICE. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
WAKE UP
Page 1 of 5   12345»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone