 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 2,210 Joined: Jun 2000 From: Koblenz, DE |
#1▸ Posted: 23 Feb 1997, 01:48 GMT
Before anyone posts the usual photocopied "Haunebu III" diagrams from some badly stapled UFO zine, let's separate three things:
1. Documented German advanced weapons research 2. Postwar Allied exploitation of German scientists 3. The later myth-complex of Nazi saucers, Antarctic bases, and occult propulsion
The mistake skeptics make is dismissing all three because the third is ridiculous. The mistake believers make is treating the first two as proof of the third.
Known baseline:
- Germany had serious rocket, jet, swept-wing, and guided weapons programs. - Operation Paperclip moved German technical expertise into US programs. - The Horten brothers were working with unconventional aircraft designs. - Viktor Schauberger's implosion/turbine ideas were real enough as biographical material, even if later claims around them became wildly inflated. - Postwar saucer sightings exploded precisely when captured German aeronautical knowledge and early Cold War secrecy overlapped.
Now the question:
Did "Nazi flying saucers" begin as a literal aircraft program, or as a camouflage myth used by Allied and Soviet intelligence to conceal captured research?
I think the saucer mythology has three layers:
Layer 1 -- Real advanced German aeronautics Jets, rockets, lifting bodies, swept wings, circular-wing experiments, vertical takeoff fantasies.
Layer 2 -- Allied intelligence laundering Captured projects reappear as rumours, dead-end diagrams, occult whispers, and contradictory witness accounts. This creates a fog bank around what was actually taken.
Layer 3 -- Esoteric infection Postwar occultists, neo-Nazis, contactees, and South America/Antarctica fantasists attach Vril, Thule, Aldebaran, hollow earth, etc.
The result is a self-defending myth. Skeptics attack the occult garbage. Believers retreat to Paperclip. Nobody cleanly maps the middle layer.
Questions:
- Were any circular-wing or disc-shaped prototypes actually tested in Germany, Italy, Canada, or the US from 1943--1955? - Did Allied intelligence deliberately encourage "Nazi saucer" stories to hide boring-but-important aerodynamic work? - Why do so many later UFO motifs mirror wartime secret weapons rumours? - Are the Antarctic claims pure fantasy, or postwar ratline displacement narratives mapped onto geography?
Suggested reading trail:
- Operation Paperclip documentation - Horten aircraft development - Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar - Early CIA / Air Force UFO files - Project Sign, Grudge, Blue Book - Postwar German scientist transfers - South American ratline investigations - Occult revival material, but treated as contamination layer, not evidence
Working hypothesis:
The Nazi saucer is not a machine. It is a fossil imprint left in the public imagination by captured aerospace research, intelligence misdirection, Cold War paranoia, and occult fascist wish-fulfilment.
But fossil imprints still tell us something about the animal that made them.
the saucer is a fossil, not a machine |