PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  ANCIENT ANOMALIES  »  Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech  »  the Antikythera mechanism is the real "ancient tech" and it's REAL
✎ Post Reply   « Ancient Astronauts & Lost Tech
the Antikythera mechanism is the real "ancient tech" and it's REAL
Page 1 of 2   12»
opus_reticulatum
Member
◆◆
Posts: 274
Joined: Apr 2001
From: exiled from the archaeology forums
#1▸ Posted: 05 Feb 1998, 09:12 GMT
Let's stop with Atlantis death-rays and crystal skulls for five minutes. In 1901, Greek sponge divers off the island of Antikythera hauled up the remains of a Roman-era shipwreck. Among the bronze and marble, they found a corroded lump about the size of a fist. For decades nobody knew what it was.

Then Derek de Solla Price got his hands on it and started X-raying it in the 1950s. What he found inside: gears. Dozens of them, interlocking, carved from bronze with extraordinary precision. Dates to around 100 BC. This is not a theory. This is not a legend. This is a machine that worked -- an ancient analog computer for tracking the moon and planets, built by Greeks who understood astronomy well enough to do it.

The real ancient mystery isn't little green men. It's that we forgot our own past was this good.
seeking real wonders in the wreckage
Deborah_Q
Member
◆◆
Posts: 73
Joined: Nov 1997
From: UK
#2▸ Posted: 07 Feb 1998, 08:25 GMT
opus_reticulatum, thank you for this. The Antikythera mechanism is one of the most humbling objects in archaeology precisely because it is honest. No mysticism, no propaganda -- just engineering.

Price's X-ray studies showed that the back dial alone tracks the Metonic cycle, which is 19 years. The Saros cycle for eclipse prediction is also encoded in the gearing. The Greeks knew Hipparchus's work on the precession of the equinoxes, and this device implements that knowledge in bronze. It is mechanical astronomy at a level we did not think possible until the medieval Islamic astrolabes.

The real wonder? They did it by hand. Files and hand tools. No factory, no CAD software. Just geometry, patience, and a society that valued precision enough to spend the time.
DrMarlow
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 612
Joined: Sep 2001
From: Durham, UK
#3▸ Posted: 09 Feb 1998, 07:39 GMT
Deborah_Q and opus_reticulatum have it right. The Antikythera mechanism sits at the intersection of Hipparchus's observational astronomy and the Stoic philosophical tradition -- the Greeks believed the cosmos was rationally ordered and knowable. This device is that philosophy made brass and teeth.

It is also, I should note, not unique in principle. We have references in ancient texts to other mechanisms, geared devices, automata built by Heron of Alexandria and others. The Antikythera mechanism is the only surviving example this complex, which is why it startles us. But it reflects a wider culture of precise mechanical thinking that flourished in the Hellenistic world.

What killed that tradition was not ignorance of the ancients who came after, but the collapse of the economic and educational infrastructure that supported it. The Middle Ages did not forget how to make gears. They inherited a broken world.
history in gears
Halvorsen
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 176
Joined: Feb 1996
From: Norway
#4▸ Posted: 11 Feb 1998, 06:52 GMT
I have been reading Price's measurements, and I want to emphasize one thing: the machining tolerances on those gears are extraordinary. The teeth are cut to within a fraction of a millimeter. The gears mesh without binding. This is not lucky accident. This is skill.

You can cut gears by hand with files and dividers if you know what you are doing. It is slow, it is exacting, and it requires someone who understands the geometry of involute curves -- or at minimum, understands it empirically through long practice. The Antikythera craftsman, or craftsmen, had that knowledge. They could have been trained in a workshop tradition that went back centuries. We simply do not know.

But the evidence in the metal itself says: these people could work. That is enough.
bronze and files
Tomasz_K
Member
◆◆
Posts: 57
Joined: Mar 1996
From: Poland
#5▸ Posted: 13 Feb 1998, 06:06 GMT
This thread is making me angry at the alien-pushers, and I mean that sincerely. The whole genre of "ancient astronaut" writing assumes that if something is skillful and clever, it must have come from off-world. As if human beings were too stupid to invent a geared machine. As if the Greeks -- who gave us mathematics, philosophy, geometry, who built temples and theaters -- could not possibly have engineered something this intricate without help from the stars.

The Antikythera mechanism is the opposite of evidence for ancient aliens. It is evidence that we -- Greeks, Egyptians, Babylonians -- were smarter than the modern world gives us credit for. We had craft traditions, apprenticeships, written knowledge that is mostly lost now. That is the lesson. We underestimated ancient humans. And we still do.

I am writing my thesis on exactly this: the gap between what we assume the ancients could do and what the material record shows they did do.
studying what we got wrong
Deborah_Q
Member
◆◆
Posts: 73
Joined: Nov 1997
From: UK
#6▸ Posted: 15 Feb 1998, 05:19 GMT
Tomasz_K, this is it exactly. The Antikythera mechanism is not exotic. It is the opposite. It is the logical endpoint of Greek mathematics applied to a practical problem: how do we model the heavens in a portable form? How do we predict eclipses? How do we track the Metonic cycle for calendar reform?

The answers the Greeks gave were rational. They followed from Euclid, from Hipparchus's observations, from the Stoic conviction that the cosmos is knowable. You do not need gods or aliens to explain it. You need geometers, bronze-workers, and time. All things the ancient Mediterranean had in abundance.
Anonymous Coward
anon
(unregistered)
User ID: 14861462
From: a VPN, probably
#7▸ Posted: 17 Feb 1998, 04:33 GMT
OK but if they had COMPUTERS in 100 BC, who GAVE them the tech? You don't just invent a machine like that out of nowhere. Somebody had to teach them. Somebody had to have the knowledge already. So where did the Greeks get it?
DrMarlow
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 612
Joined: Sep 2001
From: Durham, UK
#8▸ Posted: 19 Feb 1998, 03:47 GMT
Anonymous Coward -- the knowledge came from the same place all knowledge comes from: observation, mathematics, and the slow accumulation of craft techniques across generations. The Greeks did not invent astronomy in 100 BC. Babylonian astronomers were tracking planets and predicting eclipses at least a thousand years earlier, using arithmetic and tables. The Greeks inherited that tradition, translated it, and added their geometric and mechanical sophistication to it.

Hipparchus did not wake up one morning and decide to invent eclipse prediction. He built on the Babylonian Saros cycle. What the Antikythera craftsman did was take that knowledge and put it into a machine. That is not alien. That is synthesis. That is what humans do when we have enough education and enough time to think.
history in gears
Page 1 of 2   12»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone