PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  UFOLOGY & AERIAL PHENOMENA  »  Sightings & Case Files  »  a photo I took in the desert in 1981, finally scanned it
✎ Post Reply   « Sightings & Case Files
a photo I took in the desert in 1981, finally scanned it
desert_Ron_AZ
Member (inactive)
Posts: 22
Joined: Apr 1997
From: Yuma, AZ
#1▸ Posted: 11 Aug 1998, 16:20 MST
Finally got the scanner working so here is one I have wondered about since 1981. Took it east of Yuma, evening, this thing was just hanging there and then it was not. No sound I can remember but I was a ways off. Scanned from the print, sorry about the quality, the print was not great to begin with.

Probably nothing. Figured I would put it somewhere.
Yuma, AZ, summer 1981. Scanned 1998. -- Ron
just wondering
hangar_rat_Hank
Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Jun 2000
From: Tucson, AZ
#2▸ Posted: 13 Aug 1998, 09:05 MST
That is a helicopter. That is so obviously a helicopter that I scrolled back up to make sure I was not being set up. You can see the tail boom, the blob on the left is the rotor disc blurred by your shutter, and Yuma is lousy with military rotor traffic because of the proving ground. Twenty years and nobody told you it was a helicopter? Somebody should have.
it is a Cessna or it is a helicopter, usually
desert_Ron_AZ
Member (inactive)
Posts: 22
Joined: Apr 1997
From: Yuma, AZ
#3▸ Posted: 20 Aug 1998, 17:41 MST
Fair enough. You are probably right about the boom, I never saw it that way. The proving ground makes sense too. I will leave it up in case anyone wants to argue but I am not going to be the one arguing. Thanks for the straight answer, most places would have strung me along.
just wondering
hangar_rat_Hank
Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Jun 2000
From: Tucson, AZ
#4▸ Posted: 23 Aug 1998, 08:12 MST
Credit where due, Ron. Most people ask for a straight answer and then get mad when they receive one.

I am still saying helicopter. I am also saying keep the old scans coming if you have them, because sometimes the ordinary explanation is useful too.
it is a Cessna or it is a helicopter, usually
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone