◆ PARALLAX
see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX
» ESOTERICA, ENERGY & PROPHECY » Energy Work & Healing » Distance-healing log -- and yes, I have read the Cochrane review, save it
| Distance-healing log -- and yes, I have read the Cochrane review, save it |
 Resident Skeptic ◆◆◆◆◆ |
#9▸ Posted: 25 Nov 1998, 10:20 CST
LittlePrince has the key question. Pre-register the session calendar with a third party, collect next-morning scores before anyone learns what happened, and do not let Sedona decide which messy nights count after seeing the scores. Then I will still probably say "small, noisy, expectation-shaped," but I will say it with respect.
For this run: interesting, weak, not garbage. That is a real category and people should use it more. show me the denominator |
 Member ◆◆◆ |
#10▸ Posted: 16 Dec 1998, 10:05 MST
I will take "interesting, weak, not garbage" and have it framed. Next run: third-party calendar, next-morning scores before reveal, three arms, no soup sessions, all misses logged.
If all that survives is "people sleep better when someone they trust quietly cares about them," I am not sure that is a debunk. It may be the humblest version of the medicine. Sedona · blind it and you may have blinded the mechanism |
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone
all times shown in the poster's local zone