 Member ◆◆◆ Posts: 168 Joined: Feb 1997 From: Washington, DC, US |
#1▸ Posted: 25 Jun 2000, 11:03 CET
Every few weeks someone here mentions buying a decommissioned silo as if it were a solved problem, so I want to lay out what the record actually shows, because for once this is a topic with a genuine paper trail.
The Atlas-F and Titan sites are really surplus. They were deactivated in the 60s and 70s, the closures are documented, and a lot of the properties passed through the General Services Administration into private hands. You can find the deed transfers at the county level. That part is not a rumor -- it is recorded, and unusually well for this forum's usual topics.
What the sales listings leave out is the remediation. Many of these sites used trichloroethylene as a degreasing solvent, and a fair number have contaminated groundwater as a result. The EPA and the state environmental agencies keep files on this. Before I would take any "move-in ready" claim seriously I would want the environmental record for that specific parcel, not the general brochure.
The second gap is water, the ordinary kind. A hole that deep sits below the water table in a lot of counties, and the original crews ran pumps around the clock. A silo sealed up for thirty years is very often flooded at the bottom. The seller's photos rarely show the lower levels, and that is usually why.
I am not in the market for one. I could not maintain it and would not want to. But if someone here is serious, do it the boring way: pull the county deed, ask the state for the environmental file, and get an honest read on the water before you fall in love with the door.
-- Marcus_Reed, Washington DC. I read the footnotes so you don't have to. |