PARALLAX · established 1995 · evidence first · no hoaxes · no threats · write the date down

PARALLAX

see it twice.
sightings & case files · the experiencers · cryptozoology · ancient anomalies · esoterica & prophecy · preparedness — an international community since 1995
PARALLAX  »  UFOLOGY & AERIAL PHENOMENA  »  Underground & Off-World Bases  »  Cheyenne Mountain -- the real one everyone forgets is real
✎ Post Reply   « Underground & Off-World Bases
Cheyenne Mountain -- the real one everyone forgets is real
Page 1 of 2   12»
Coldwar_Cobb
⊘ BANNED
◆◆
Posts: 612
Joined: Sep 1999
From: Idaho, US
#1▸ Posted: 16 Sep 2002, 09:12 EST
Everyone spends time chasing Dulce. Area 51. The usual suspects. But here is what nobody seems to want to discuss: Cheyenne Mountain is real, documented, and sitting under a couple thousand feet of granite in Colorado. Twenty-five-ton blast doors. Buildings mounted on giant springs like they are floating. An entire complex built to survive a near-miss nuclear strike. And the best part: it is not secret. The specs are public. Environmental impact statements from the 70s. Congressional budget lines. The reason I am posting this is that Cheyenne Mountain teaches you something the rumor mills do not -- a real hardened facility leaves a paper trail. Let's talk about what we actually know about the one that exists.
collins_classifieds
Member
◆◆
Posts: 53
Joined: Feb 1995
From: the van (local only)
#2▸ Posted: 17 Sep 2002, 12:00 EST
The bit that interests me is the comms, not the doors. A hole in a mountain is just a hole in a mountain. What makes it a command post is everything they had to do to keep talking to the outside through that much rock -- the antennas, the lines, the filtering. That is the hard part, and the part nobody photographs.

Cobb has the right of it though. The real one is on the record, permits and all. The ones with no paper are the ones to go careful believing. Cheap to say, harder to remember when the story is a good one.
Renata_Vos
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 121
Joined: Feb 1997
From: Virginia, US
#3▸ Posted: 17 Sep 2002, 22:53 EST
Cobb is right. Construction started in 1961, fully operational by 1966 as the underground command center for NORAD. That is not speculative -- the public record is solid. They used to run tours through parts of it. Not the sensitive areas, but the entrance, some of the tunnels. Families on vacation walked through it and took pictures.

What is interesting is how much they disclosed at the time -- Cold War transparency, show the public we are protected, show the other side we are hardened. The blast doors weigh twenty-five tons each. The complex sits under about two thousand feet of mountain. The buildings inside ride on giant springs and shock absorbers to isolate them from ground shock. All documented. No guessing.
archivist
Curt_Hollis
Member
◆◆
Posts: 76
Joined: Apr 1996
From: Nevada, US
#4▸ Posted: 19 Sep 2002, 12:35 EST
The construction angle is what gets me. People do not understand how hard it is to excavate inside granite. You are not digging a basement -- you are removing hundreds of thousands of tons of rock from inside a mountain, drilling and blasting, hauling the rubble out through tunnels. The excavation alone took years. Then you reinforce what is left and build hardened structures inside.

The spring-mounted buildings are real engineering, not fantasy. You bolt a structure to springs and dampers, and if the mountain gets rocked by a nearby blast, the building rides it out instead of shaking to pieces. It is elegant and it is real. Harder to dramatize than "twelve levels below the desert," but the real thing is more impressive: an actual solution to a hard problem.
Marcus_Reed
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 168
Joined: Feb 1997
From: Washington, DC, US
#5▸ Posted: 21 Sep 2002, 02:17 EST
This is the point for anyone who follows the underground-base rumors: real facilities leave paper. Cheyenne Mountain has environmental impact statements filed with federal agencies, budget allocations in Congressional records, construction contracts and timelines. You could research it from primary sources.

Dulce, by contrast, has none of that. No environmental filings. No budget lines. No contracts in the Federal Register. No testimony. The rumor says it has operated since the 50s, but there is no paper trail. That is the crucial difference: a real deep facility cannot hide its funding or its permits. Money and construction leave traces. If Dulce existed the way people describe, you would see those traces. You do not.
offgrid_Otto
Member
◆◆◆
Posts: 880
Joined: Jul 1999
From: rural Montana, US
#6▸ Posted: 22 Sep 2002, 15:59 EST
The thing about the romance of these places is that the actual experience would be fluorescent lights and concrete and the hum of ventilation. From the old accounts, working inside Cheyenne Mountain was not glamorous. Rows of desks, communications gear, corridors with too much air conditioning and no sunlight. The blast doors are impressive, but once you are through them you are in a military facility.

There is something almost reassuring about that. It strips away the mystique. What people imagine as a vast hidden facility is probably a lot less exotic than they think. The real one shows you what hardened command actually looks like.
Brandt_E
Member
◆◆
Posts: 96
Joined: Mar 1997
From: Fort Hood, TX
#7▸ Posted: 24 Sep 2002, 05:41 EST
From a military standpoint the logic is straightforward. You need a command center that can survive a near-miss. A surface facility is useless for that. Underground, deep in rock, with hardening and isolation -- that is the only way to keep command authority intact.

But the fantasies always get the engineering wrong. "Twelve secret levels below" is not how it works. You do not stack levels like a parking garage. You build horizontally in the rock and use the mountain's natural protection. Cheyenne Mountain has roughly two thousand feet of overburden -- a lot, but not a thousand levels down. The minute you understand the actual engineering, the rumors look less plausible.
Occams_Razorback
Resident Skeptic
◆◆◆◆◆
Posts: 16,720
Joined: Apr 1998
From: Chicago, US
#8▸ Posted: 25 Sep 2002, 19:23 EST
The lesson is that a documented, real facility becomes the baseline for comparison. Cheyenne Mountain exists, built for a specific purpose, with a construction history, a function, a timeline. Engineers designed it, Congress funded it, the government disclosed parts of it.

Compare that to the rumors -- Dulce, the secret levels nobody can verify -- and the difference is obvious. That is not to say nothing classified exists; it certainly does. But the classified things would still have a structure similar to this: funding traces, engineering signatures. They would not exist purely on rumor. The documented base is the antidote to the undocumented one.
Page 1 of 2   12»
✎ Post Reply
PARALLAX · see it twice. · evidence first · write the date down · sources or it didn't happen
all times shown in the poster's local zone